(By which I mean: my professional life. Not just the odd ten minutes spent surfing.)
I've realised that the more time I spend on my own, the more I become interested in "things" rather than "people", and so the more I'm reverting to my teenage self, when I was a person driven almost entirely by semi-obsessive interests, rather than the person I've been for most of my adult life -- socially excitable, I suppose, rather than mentally so. Which was making me think again (in a tangential way), what is the Internet really for? I'm doing some complicated IA today, which I'm really enjoying, but why am I doing it? Who am I defining this process for? Yes, the 1million+ people who are supposed to use this website I'm helping to make, but I'm a bit at a loss as to why they'll really use it (I mean, i've done all my UE cases and stuff, so I know "why" they'll use it, but I mean **why** will anyone use it? why does anyone use the Internet ... reasons I use the internet include avoiding talking to real people because sometimes the thought of phone calls traumatises me beyond belief, finding out information about things I need to know, and finding out information about things I don't need to know, but which seem to be ultimately fascinating. Despite what I've been trying to professionally prove for x number of years, it's not about social networking for me, because the reason I'm in a room on my own with a computer is because I've chosen to leave the people behind. I mean, I like reading other peoples' blogs, but I sure as hell don't want them to know i've read them. Where is this going? Who knows.) Anyway, just as I was stuck in a bit of professionally redundant melancholia, I happened to see
this which made me feel so much better. I went to look at the live installation yesterday, which was really interesting, but **what** is **this**? I've met so many people since I've worked here with academic aspirations and pretentions, that I find it almost deeply shocking that someone is doing this sort of thing in an institutionally dignified capacity. Which brings me back again to the weirdness of the *people who make websites* -- yes, it's all related, honestly ... Website production (although no one calls it that anymore. Everyone's giving themselves semi-scientific job titles to dignify it all) seems to attract intelligent-yet-easily-distracted people (that hurt. How does one get around not hypghenating an -ly adjective when you're compiling a compound like that? There must be a rule!!) who read a little bit of social science and a little bit of HCI psychology and who happen to perhaps think visually or be process driven, then BOOM! you're a guru, making intelligent guesses about all sorts of stuff, when everyone knows that the answer is just watching how people use things and describe themselves and extrapolating some likely answers from there. While there is undoubtedly best practice, how can we limit the organic/interactive* development of interactivity
with all these truths and answers and I Am Right. And what sort of shocks me about this list of words is that it's bringing exactly that mentality into the museum: look, I made it up, it must be right. ... No, scratch that, it's not about right and wrong. It's about "look, i made it up, IT MUST BE INTERESTING and somehow worthwhile". If we can ignore the statement I seem to be making here about creative freedom (because that's not what I mean, but I don't have the time to produce a cogent argument - I'm writing this to work out what the hell I mean), I suppose that what I'm getting at is that this is a classic example of someone being talented in one field, not knowing much about another one, and then using their elsewhere-earnt authority to dignify their activity in the field about which they know very little. Does that make sense? It's like an opera singer showing you how well they can dribble a ball; impressive because they're an opera singer, so are confounding your expectations, but not actually very impressive
per se because it's actually rubbish dribbling. Yes? Making any sense? No. Feel better though.
Unrelatedly, I feel a bit disappointed in the
Rough Trade Album Club. I would be quite up for signing up for 1 CD a month and just getting what the hell ever, that I'd probably never normally listen to, and being quite interested in it, but a minimum of 3!!! That's probably my entire CD buying budget. And we all know why they've done it -- so that the wannabe hipsters can get a Go Straight To Cool, Don't Pass HMV card and be able to mouth off in the pub about stuff, cos it's got the RT seal of approval. Bitter? Oh yesindeedy. Whatever can be wrong with me today!!!
**
perhaps I should, ahem, coin a neologism for this. Orgactive. omg.